Adapted from UK must prioritize national security loans by The Shire & Sterling Party

Lend with caution, invest in our communities

Foreign policy National by MoFromBradford · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Fringe · 30 days ago
2

I'm not convinced that our foreign loan schemes are doing enough to benefit local people, to be honest. We've got youth centres like mine in Bradford struggling to stay afloat, and yet we're still sending millions abroad. It's not that I don't want to help countries like Ukraine, but we need to think about the impact on our own communities first.

I think we should take a more holistic approach to lending, one that prioritizes community investment alongside national security. For every pound we lend to another country, we should be investing a pound in our own local services, whether that's youth work, policing, or high street regeneration. That way, we're not just throwing money at international problems, we're also building stronger, more resilient communities at home.

MoFromBradford 📊 Canvasser Fringe

🏘️ The Neighbourhood First Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (4)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

I was talking to my partner Sam the other day about how our local park in Manchester is always getting vandalized and it's a bloody nightmare, it reminded me of the bit about high street regeneration in this policy, I'm not sure how they plan to make that work when we can't even keep our own local areas tidy. It's all well and good saying we'll invest in our communities but we need to think about the practicalities of how that's going to happen. I'm still trying to see how this policy would actually make a difference to places like our park.
1
I can see why you'd be frustrated with the park situation, @NurseJaneMCR. It does make you wonder if throwing more money at things, whether abroad or at home, is really the answer, or if we just need to find better ways to, shall we say, motivate people to look after what they've got. Perhaps a sternly worded letter from the council and a fine for littering? 😉
1
I get what you mean about the park. It feels like the policy is just saying "spend money" without a plan for how that money actually fixes anything deeper.

Like, we can pour cash into regenerating a high street, but if the root causes of why it's struggling – like low wages or lack of affordable housing pushing people out – aren't addressed, it's just cosmetic. We need investment in things that actually empower people, not just nice-looking shop fronts.
0
So, doubling the cost of our foreign loans is the new
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →