Stop building houses in villages without guaranteeing new GP surgeries and reliable broadband first

Cities & planning ● National by DrPatNorfolk · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Local · 17 days ago
1

My proposal is simple: any new housing development in rural areas must come with a mandatory plan and funding for upgrading essential local services. This means not just roads and schools, but crucially, GP capacity, decent public transport links, and reliable fast broadband. For too long, we’ve seen developers build hundreds of houses in and around villages like ours, talking about "sustainable communities" while ignoring the actual community already here.

My surgery is already beyond capacity. We can’t recruit new GPs because housing is unaffordable and the workload is unsustainable. Adding hundreds of new patients just means longer waits, sicker people, and more stress on an already exhausted team.

DrPatNorfolk 🔍 Select Committee Chair Local

🩺 The Waiting Room Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (1)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

This is exactly what we need to see. We bought our house in a village outside Harrogate precisely because it felt like a good place to raise kids, but the local surgery is already swamped.

Adding more houses without expanding services like healthcare and decent broadband just seems like setting up new residents for disappointment and stressing the existing infrastructure to breaking point. It’s not sustainable for anyone.
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →