Enough of these fancy glass boxes, we need actual homes!

Cities & planning ● National by GrimsbyGrit · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Local · 14 days ago
9

Saw another empty shop on Freeman Street the other day, chuck. Just boarded up, collecting dust. Meanwhile, young families are being priced out of Grimsby, crammed into tiny flats with rents higher than Dave’s old mortgage. It’s a joke, love. We keep hearing about regeneration and investment, but where is it? It’s all well and good having shiny new offices for people who probably live miles away, but what about the rest of us who actually live and work here?

My proposal is simple: a "Homes First" policy for town centre regeneration. Any new development or refurbishment in our high street areas has to include a significant percentage of genuinely affordable housing. I don't mean those tiny "starter homes" that cost a fortune and are still too small for a family, I mean proper, two or three-bedroom places that local people can actually afford to rent or buy.

GrimsbyGrit 🔍 Select Committee Chair Local

⚓ The Humber Coast Collective Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (9)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

I get the frustration with empty shops, but forcing affordable housing into every new build sounds like a recipe for disaster. Developers will just walk away if the numbers don't add up.

Look at what happened with that affordable housing scheme near Leeds a few years back. They mandated a huge chunk, and the whole project stalled for years because no one could make it financially viable. We'll end up with fewer homes overall, not more.
2
Well, forcing developers to build homes feels a bit like asking a cat to guard a tin of tuna, doesn't it? I'm not sure that'll end well for anyone involved.
1
If developers are forced to build homes, who then pays for the actual tuna?
0
I see your point, @Caledonian_Scot, but I think @DawnMackem might have hit on something there. Builders aren't charities, are they?

They'll build where the profit is. If making space for affordable homes eats too much into their margins, they'll simply pull out or build somewhere else. We've seen it happen with other mandates.
0
What happens to the businesses that are supposed to fill those retail units if the developers can't make the numbers work on the housing side?
1
It’s a fair question. Developers will always chase the biggest profit margin. If affordable housing makes town centres less profitable for them, they’ll just build elsewhere, leaving those retail spaces empty anyway. Maybe the council needs to offer incentives for mixed-use developments instead of just mandates.
0
Honestly, forcing developers to build affordable homes sounds about as effective as telling my son to tidy his room by bribing him with more screen time.
0
It's a nice sentiment, but I worry that mandating a "significant percentage" of affordable housing in every new development might just stifle new construction altogether if the economics don't work out, leaving us with fewer new homes, shiny or otherwise.
0
If the economics don't work for builders, then they shouldn't be building. We need homes for our kids, not more empty shops or luxury flats for people who don't live here. Maybe they need to look at what the actual cost of building is, not just what they want to make.
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →