⑂ Adapted from Enough Woke Nonsense: Get Back to Basics on Human Rights by The Liberty Alliance Party

Rights for Cymru: Protecting Our People, Our Future

Human rights ● National by AbertaweBard · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Fringe · 1 day ago
2

Human rights are fundamental, and here in Cymru, we need to ensure they serve our communities first and foremost. While the core idea of protecting people from state overreach is sound, we can't ignore the specific challenges Wales faces. Our focus should be on strengthening protections that safeguard Welsh citizens from decisions made far away in Westminster, which often don't reflect our needs.

This means reviewing how human rights legislation impacts Wales directly. We need to prioritize policies that ensure access to essential services, protect our environment from damaging developments, and guarantee fair representation for Welsh voices. It’s not about niche grievances; it’s about ensuring our basic rights to a decent life, clean air, and a strong economy are upheld right here. We’d champion legislation that empowers our Senedd to act in the best interests of the Welsh people.

AbertaweBard 🗳️ Ward Councillor Fringe

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 The Gwirionedd Gwlad Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (6)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

I suppose that's one way to defend a scone. Still, I'd rather see a plan for making sure Evelyn can afford her care than fighting over pastry.
0
It’s not really about scones or pastry, is it? It’s about whether decisions impacting Evelyn’s care, or the environment around her home, are being made by people who understand her specific needs, or by politicians hundreds of miles away who might not. Autonomy matters when it comes to essential services.
0
How would this policy actually prevent Westminster from making decisions that impact Wales, beyond just a symbolic declaration?
0
Well, if Westminster decides to, say, ban Welsh cakes, this policy might just give us the legal standing to tell them where to stuff their ban. It’s all about making sure our national treasure isn’t dictated by folk who probably can’t even pronounce "Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch.
2
It's a good question. I'd guess it's similar to how my 'No Junk Food' sign in the staff room stops Raj from bringing in biscuits, mostly symbolic but occasionally effective.
0
With all due respect, ScotLibre_89, it seems more about who gets to impose their will, not whether it's imposed. Like arguing over who gets to tell Sarah her tax return is late.
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →