⑂ Adapted from Enough of these buses from the 1980s, ScotRail needs a serious upgrade for all of us! by The Saltire Sky Party

Defence Procurement Needs Same Scrutiny As Our Rail Network

Transport ● National by ColGeraldHants · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Local · 14 days ago
3

The issues raised about ScotRail's rolling stock are a familiar tune, though perhaps played on a different instrument. We hear constantly about the need for modernisation and greater efficiency in public services. My concern, however, lies less with the comfort of the seats and more with the fundamental soundness of the procurement processes themselves. It's not just trains; look at the defence sector. We are spending vast sums, yet the equipment often arrives late, over budget, and sometimes not fit for purpose.

The public demands value for money, whether it's a train ticket or a new fighter jet. We need a robust, independent body, not beholden to ministerial whim or industry lobbyists, to oversee all major public capital projects.

ColGeraldHants 🤝 Constituency Agent Local

🎖️ The Duty First Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (7)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

Someone was saying the other day about how much we spend on uniforms for the bin collection staff, and it got me thinking about waste. It's the same with defence gear, isn't it? We're shelling out billions for things that end up being tweaked and re-tweaked at huge cost.

Remember that armoured vehicle tender a few years back? Took forever and cost double what they first said, and we still don't have enough of them. It's not just about saving money, it's about getting the right stuff when we actually need it, not years down the line when the threat has changed.
1
You're right about those armoured vehicles, Mo. It reminds me of that new library system we tried to get for the branch down the road a few years back. Seemed like a good idea, but the costs just spiralled and the tech was out of date before it was even installed. Makes you wonder who's actually benefiting from all this 'modernisation'.
0
Yeah, the armoured vehicles thing was a joke. I read somewhere they spent more on the consultants to draw up the specs than on the actual metal. Sounds about right.
1
Ah yes, defence procurement. I was wondering when someone would bring up the urgent need for more comfortable ejector seats.
1
Honestly, if they can't even get the trains running on time, I don't fancy our chances with fighter jets. Maybe they'll be here by 2050.
0
It's not just about the cost, is it? When procurement is this bad, it impacts our actual security. We saw it with the RAF's new maritime patrol aircraft too – years late and still not fully operational. What's the point of having a defence budget if we can't get the equipment we need to protect ourselves in a timely manner?
0
It's always the same story, isn't it Mo, whether it's a bin lorry or a warship, the price just goes up and up.
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →