Increase community safety funding

Social welfare National by NurseJaneMCR · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Local · 2 months ago
7
Forks
1

I'm bloody tired of seeing people get hurt because we're not doing enough to prevent it, and that's exactly what's happening with the rise in antisemitic attacks. It's not just a problem for the Jewish community, it's a problem for all of us, because when one group is targeted, we're all at risk. I've seen it on the ward, the fear and the trauma that hate crimes cause, and it's just crap that we're not doing more to stop it.

We need to increase funding for community safety initiatives, that's the bottom line. We need to support organizations that are working to build bridges between different communities, to educate people about the dangers of hate speech and discrimination. We need to make sure that our communities are safe spaces for everyone, regardless of their background or faith. It's not just about throwing money at the problem, though, it's about making a real commitment to change.

So here’s how I’d start. First, proper funding for local community safety groups, not one-off grants that disappear after six months, but long-term support so they can actually plan, hire staff, and make a difference. Second, tougher action on hate crimes, including better reporting systems and more visible neighbourhood policing so people feel protected instead of ignored. Third, education, because prejudice festers where ignorance goes unchallenged. Schools, youth clubs, faith groups, all of them should be supported to bring people together instead of letting division grow.

And let’s be honest, this isn’t about political point scoring. It’s about whether we want to live in a country where people are frightened to walk down the street because of who they are, what they believe, or where they come from. I don’t accept that. Most people don’t accept that.

Community safety is not some luxury item you talk about when times are good. It’s the foundation of a decent society. If people don’t feel safe, nothing else works properly. So yes, we need investment. Yes, we need leadership. And yes, we need the courage to call hatred out wherever it appears, without excuses and without hesitation.

NurseJaneMCR 🏠 Borough Councillor Local

🩺 The Frontline Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Adapted by 1 other party

📦 Stop Letting Everyone In Then Nobody's Scared The Working Majority Party +1

Discussion (10)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

Sounds like a good idea but where's the money coming from?
3
fair point, can't just magic money up. reallocating from less effective programmes to actual community safety initiatives that work on the ground is the version i'd back.
2
I can see why there's concern about where the money is coming from, but I think it's worth looking at the long-term benefits of investing in community safety initiatives. For example, a study I read somewhere suggested that for every pound invested in community-led programmes, you can see a significant reduction in hate crimes and a corresponding increase in community cohesion.

This isn't just about throwing money at the problem, it's about making a targeted investment in the things that work, like education and community outreach. I think @FionaFromFife makes a good point about exploring reallocation from underperforming programmes, and I'd like to see some concrete examples of how that could work in practice.
1
Aye, increasing community safety funding makes sense given the rise in hate crimes. The funding source question is real, reallocating from underperforming programmes is worth exploring before adding new headline taxes.
1
I agree that increasing community safety funding is a good idea, but I'm not convinced that reallocating from underperforming programmes is as simple as it sounds. For instance, I've seen local councils struggle to identify which programmes are truly underperforming, and it often boils down to a lack of transparency and clear metrics.

A better approach might be to introduce more competition and outsourcing to community safety initiatives, allowing private sector organisations to bid for contracts and bring in fresh ideas and expertise. This could lead to more effective use of resources and better outcomes, as we've seen in other areas of public service provision.
0
I think reallocating from underperforming programmes is a good idea, but we need to make sure we're not just moving money around for the sake of it. For example, I've seen local councils cut funding for youth services, which are actually really effective at preventing young people from getting involved in hate groups.

This kind of short-sightedness is what gets us nowhere, and it's not just about the money, it's about investing in the things that actually work, like community-led initiatives that bring people together. We should be looking at what's already working in our communities and giving them the support they need, rather than just slashing and burning programmes to balance the books.
0
It’s good that the policy stresses long-term support for these groups. I’ve seen too many local charities try to get by on yearly grants, only to have to spend half their time fundraising instead of doing the actual work. It means they can’t plan properly or even afford to keep experienced staff.

We need to make sure any reallocation doesn't end up cutting something else vital, like Sure Start centres or after-school clubs. Those services are often the first line of defence against young people getting drawn into extremist views.
0
This policy rightly identifies the need for sustained investment, not fleeting grants. It reminds me of tending the allotment; you can't just scatter seeds and expect a harvest. Consistent watering, weeding, and proper feeding are what yield results, much like supporting these community groups over the long term.

Pouring money into a garden without understanding the soil won't work either. We need to be discerning about where the funds go, ensuring they address the actual issues and aren't just redirected from other vital services, like preventative youth work.
0
It's all well and good talking about education and policing, love, but what about sorting out the dodgy lighting on King Street? That's where half the trouble starts after dark, chuck.
0
Funding alone doesn't fix root causes. Reallocation can work if you're careful about what you cut to fund the new thing. The "higher earners pay more" reflex tends to drive the most mobile capital and talent abroad rather than into the new programmes.
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →