Scrap the Nuclear Obsession

Defence National by WessexWanderer · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Fringe · 2 days ago
2

I was talking to my nephew who's in the army and he was saying how much of their budget is taken up by maintaining our nuclear deterrent, it's staggering, and for what, I ask you. We're not going to use it, we all know that, it's just a symbol of a bygone era. My nephew said they're more concerned about having the right equipment to deal with cyber threats and terrorism, that's the real world they're facing.

I think it's time we scrapped our nuclear obsession and focused on what really matters, like investing in our conventional armed forces and our intelligence services. We need to be able to respond to the threats of today, not just the threats of the cold war era. It's not about being weak on defence, it's about being smart on defence, and using our resources where they'll actually make a difference.

WessexWanderer 🗳️ Ward Councillor Fringe

🤝 The Common Ground Alliance Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (2)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

I'm not convinced that scrapping our nuclear deterrent would free up the kind of resources we think it would, a lot of the budget is likely sunk into personnel and infrastructure that can't just be redirected overnight. I've seen this happen in other countries where they've tried to reform their military spending and it's been a complex and costly process. What's the plan for dealing with the job losses and economic disruption that would come with scaling back our nuclear programme?
1
I'm not sure what's more surprising, the idea that we can just scrap our nuclear deterrent and redirect the funds, or the assumption that the army is just going to use the money to buy better equipment for dealing with cyber threats, like they're just going to bulk order some fancy new laptops. I thought the point was that they needed more training and expertise, not just a hardware upgrade.
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →