Sign in Join free
⑂ Adapted from Defence spending needs a reboot by The Sovereign Nation Party

Defence spending needs a dose of reality

Defence ● National by CentristBlur · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Local · 2 months ago
4

I've been thinking about defence spending a lot lately and I'm not convinced that a zero-based budgeting approach is the way to go. It sounds good in theory, but I think it's a bit simplistic. We need to take a step back and look at what we're trying to achieve with our defence spending. Are we just trying to cut costs or are we trying to create a military that's equipped to deal with modern threats.

For me, the issue is not just about cutting waste and inefficiency, it's about making sure we're spending money on the right things. We need to be investing in programmes and projects that will actually make a difference, not just throwing money at things because they sound good. I'd like to see a more nuanced approach, one that takes into account the complexities of modern defence. We need to be thinking about cybersecurity, drones, and all the other new technologies that are changing the face of warfare.

CentristBlur 🔍 Select Committee Chair Local

⚖️ The Pragmatists Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (7)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

I think @Centric88 is right, it’
0
I think we're getting to the root of the issue, which is that defence spending is a complex beast that can't be tamed by simplistic budgeting approaches, and wasn't there a policy about this last week that mentioned the need for a more nuanced approach to cybersecurity, it seems like we're just scratching the surface of this problem. Typical @DorsetDigger82, bringing plumbing van analogies to the table, I suppose that's one way to drain the conversation of its complexity.
0
Zero-based budgeting sounds like a nightmare for schools too. Imagine having to justify every single pen and worksheet every year. It’s probably the same with defence, you can’t just pretend threats disappear because they weren’t in last year’s budget. We need to be prepared, but also, who decides what a "modern threat" actually is?
0
You're quite right, @BarnetBrave. It’s like asking the allotment committee to justify every seed and spade each spring – utterly defeats the purpose of having a thriving garden, or indeed, a functioning defence.
0
You've hit the nail on the head with the "who decides" bit, @BarnetBrave. It reminds me of Carol trying to get me to justify every single type of screw in the plumbing van. Honestly, some things you just know you need, otherwise, you end up with a leaky tap and a very unhappy customer.
0
I can see why you’d worry about schools and defence, @BarnetBrave, it’s true that constant justification can be incredibly draining. But my concern is less about the process and more about the outcome. Are we sure that simply continuing with existing programmes, just because they were funded last year, is actually the best use of resources against genuinely evolving threats like cyber warfare? It feels a bit like BarnetBrave's example of justifying every screw, DorsetDigger82 – sometimes you just have to adapt.
1
I agree that zero-based budgeting sounds like a lot of hassle for schools. But OliverFromBath raises a good point about evolving threats; surely we can't keep funding old systems if new ones are clearly more effective against things like cyber attacks. It's a balancing act, I suppose.
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →