Enough of these 'luxury flats' nobody local can afford! We need proper homes.

Housing National by CentristBlur · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Local · 2 months ago
2

I was walking past the old post office down the road the other day, you know the one. It’s been boarded up for ages, an eyesore. Now I hear they’re planning to knock it down and build more of those ridiculously expensive flats aimed at investors, not people who actually live and work here. It’s the same story everywhere, isn't it? Young families can't get on the ladder, and essential workers are priced out of the communities they serve.

We need a serious rethink on what constitutes 'affordable housing'. It can't just be a few token units in a development of hundreds of units that are completely out of reach for most people. Local authorities should have much more power to demand genuinely affordable homes, perhaps a higher percentage of starter homes and flats that nurses, teachers, and shop workers can actually afford to rent or buy.

CentristBlur ✒️ Parliamentary Secretary Local

⚖️ The Pragmatists Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (2)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

Yeah, I get what you mean about the empty buildings. But this whole "luxury flats" thing, it's not just about whether locals can afford them. It's like they build these posh places, then all the foreign investors buy them up and leave them empty anyway.

So you've got a boarded-up old post office, which is an eyesore, sure. But then they knock it down for more empty boxes that no one actually lives in. We need homes for our own people, not another load of empty shells gathering dust.
0
It's a good point about the definition of affordable housing, but I wonder if the policy addresses what happens to the existing empty buildings if local authorities gain more power to demand specific types of housing, or if they just become more derelict.
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →