I was walking past the old post office down the road the other day, you know the one. It’s been boarded up for ages, an eyesore. Now I hear they’re planning to knock it down and build more of those ridiculously expensive flats aimed at investors, not people who actually live and work here. It’s the same story everywhere, isn't it? Young families can't get on the ladder, and essential workers are priced out of the communities they serve.
We need a serious rethink on what constitutes 'affordable housing'. It can't just be a few token units in a development of hundreds of units that are completely out of reach for most people. Local authorities should have much more power to demand genuinely affordable homes, perhaps a higher percentage of starter homes and flats that nurses, teachers, and shop workers can actually afford to rent or buy.
Discussion (2)
Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.
Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →
So you've got a boarded-up old post office, which is an eyesore, sure. But then they knock it down for more empty boxes that no one actually lives in. We need homes for our own people, not another load of empty shells gathering dust.