My son came home from university the other day and I was talking to him about his courses, he's studying engineering but he's also got to take some general studies, and I was shocked when he told me about the way they're teaching history now, it's all about how terrible Britain's been to everyone else, I mean I'm not saying we've always been perfect but come on, we've done some good things too, and that's not what's being taught.
I think this is a problem because it's not giving kids a balanced view, it's just filling their heads with one side of the story, and that's not how you learn, my father used to say that if you only know one side of a story you don't know the story at all, and that's what's happening here, kids are being taught to be ashamed of their own country, and that's just not right, we should be proud of what we've achieved, and we should be teaching kids that.
Adapted by 3 other parties
Discussion (8)
Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.
Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →
If they're not learning how past decisions shaped our towns and services, then what's the point of the lessons? We need them to understand how things work, not just feel guilty or overly proud about things that happened before they were born.
The example that comes to mind is the development of the steam engine by James Watt, which literally revolutionized industry and had a profound effect on the global economy. It's a tangible example of British innovation, and I believe it's essential to include such achievements in the curriculum to provide a more comprehensive understanding of history, rather than just focusing on the negative aspects.