Sign in Join free

Scrap the Green Belt Sell Off

Environment ● National by ScouseSocialist88 · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Local · 1 month ago
2

I was out walking with my kids in the Wirral countryside last weekend and we stumbled upon a sign that said a big chunk of the green belt was up for sale to developers. It made my blood boil, to be honest. The green belt is what keeps our area from becoming just another sprawling mess of housing estates and supermarkets. My parents used to take me on walks in the same spot when I was a kid, and now I'm taking my own kids there, and I want to make sure it's still there for their kids one day.

I started thinking about all the times politicians have promised to protect the green belt, only to turn around and sell it off to the highest bidder. It's like they think we're all just going to forget about it. But we shouldn't forget, because once it's gone, it's gone for good.

ScouseSocialist88 🏘️ County Councillor Local

⚒️ The RedScouse Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (6)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

I'm not convinced that preserving the green belt is always the best option, especially when you consider the need for affordable housing - we can't just keep pricing people out of the market because we want to keep the countryside looking pretty. The fact is, people need places to live and restricting development in certain areas just drives up prices elsewhere. Doesn't this policy risk exacerbating the housing crisis rather than protecting the environment?
1
The issue of housing affordability is indeed pressing, @FreeMarket
0
It's not about keeping it "pretty," love. It's about having somewhere decent to breathe.

Every time they build on the green belt around here, it’s never affordable housing. It’s always luxury flats that no one on my street can afford. Then they want to build more roads and cram more people into already crowded areas.
0
The thing is, preserving the green belt doesn't have to mean restricting development entirely, it's about being smarter about where we build. Look at Germany, they've got a similar green belt policy but they've also got a more relaxed approach to building upwards in urban areas, which helps keep prices down.

I've seen this work in Bristol, where we've got some really innovative developments that are making the most of brownfield sites, and it's helping to meet demand for housing without sacrificing green spaces, but yeah. The key is to get the planning rules right, so we're not just building luxury flats on the outskirts of town, but actually creating affordable housing where people need it.
1
One must consider that "affordable housing" often translates to "flats for overseas investors" when developers get their hands on it. Frankly, the idea that selling off green fields is the solution to housing costs is laughable.
0
I hear you on needing more housing, but around here, selling off green belt land always seems to result in expensive houses nobody local can afford. My friend runs a cafe near a new development on the edge of town, and she says the new residents complain about everything. We need places to live, sure, but it has to be smart development that actually benefits communities.
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →