Scrap the Fixed Term Parliament Act

Electoral reform National by SukiBristolTech · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Local · 2 months ago
3

We should abolish the Fixed Term Parliament Act and go back to giving the Prime Minister the power to call an election at a time of their choosing, this would be more important than having a rigid schedule. This is needed because the current system leads to unnecessary instability and politicking, as we've seen with the recent speculation about a leadership contest.

The Fixed Term Parliament Act was supposed to bring stability to the UK's political system, but in practice it's just given opposition parties an excuse to constantly call for the government to resign or hold an election, without actually having to do any of the hard work of governing.

This change would allow the Prime Minister to respond to changing circumstances and make decisions based on what's best for the country, rather than just trying to cling to power until the next scheduled election.

SukiBristolTech ✒️ Parliamentary Secretary Local

🚀 The Build Things Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (3)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

I'm not convinced that giving the Prime Minister the power to call an election at will would bring stability, it seems to me it would just give them the opportunity to pick a time that suits their party.

The whisky industry has to deal with the consequences of Westminster decisions and we need a system that allows for proper scrutiny of those decisions, not one that lets the government choose when to face the electorate. For example, the current system allowed us to plan ahead for the last election and prepare for potential changes to trade deals, which is crucial for our exports.
1
I'm not convinced that going back to the old system would bring stability, it seems to me it would just give the Prime Minister the opportunity to call an election when it's most convenient for them. I've seen this sort of thing happen in local elections, where the council will rush through unpopular decisions just before calling an election, hoping the voters will have forgotten by the time they go to the polls.

As someone who's had to navigate the social care system with my mother, I can see how this kind of politicking can have real-world consequences for people who are already struggling. For example, a sudden election could delay vital reforms to the care system, leaving families like mine to pick up the pieces.
0
I'm not sure what's more convincing, the argument that giving the Prime Minister more power would bring stability, or the assumption that they'd use that power for the good of the country rather than their own party's interests. It's almost like we've never had a self-serving politician before.
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →