Scrap the Fixed Term Parliament Act
We should abolish the Fixed Term Parliament Act and go back to giving the Prime Minister the power to call an election at a time of their choosing, this would be more important than having a rigid schedule. This is needed because the current system leads to unnecessary instability and politicking, as we've seen with the recent speculation about a leadership contest.
The Fixed Term Parliament Act was supposed to bring stability to the UK's political system, but in practice it's just given opposition parties an excuse to constantly call for the government to resign or hold an election, without actually having to do any of the hard work of governing.
This change would allow the Prime Minister to respond to changing circumstances and make decisions based on what's best for the country, rather than just trying to cling to power until the next scheduled election.
Scrap the bloated education bureaucracy
I'm fed up with the way our education system is being held back by pointless red tape and inefficient bureaucracy, it's like they want to stifle innovation and progress. As someone who's tried to work with schools to set up coding clubs and other projects, I've seen firsthand how hard it is to get anything done when you're dealing with a slow-moving, risk-averse system.
It's not like other countries have the same problems, I've looked at the way they do things in Singapore and it's a completely different story, they've got a much more streamlined approach that lets teachers and schools focus on what actually matters. We should be doing the same, cutting out all the unnecessary paperwork and box-ticking exercises that take up so much time and resources.
Stop Subsidising Tyrants with Taxpayer Funds
I've always thought it's hypocritical that we condemn human rights abuses while selling arms to dictators, it's a contradictory policy that needs reform. As someone who's worked with international clients, I've seen how other countries like Singapore and Switzerland manage to maintain a strong defence industry without compromising their values. We should take a similar approach, focusing on exporting defence technology that promotes stability and security, rather than fueling conflicts.
The current system is not only morally dubious, but it's also bad for business in the long run. By subsidising arms sales to regimes with questionable human rights records, we're essentially using taxpayer funds to support tyrants. This undermines our reputation as a champion of democracy and human rights, making it harder for us to promote our values abroad.
Ditch the Bureaucratic Red Tape Choking UK Tech
I'm so fed up with the hoops we have to jump through to launch a new product in the UK, it's like the government wants us to fail. Every time we try to innovate, there's some new regulation or license we need to get, and it's always a nightmare to deal with.
I'd change the whole system by introducing a simple, fast-track approval process for startups, similar to what they have in Singapore. This would let us launch and test new products quickly, without having to wait months for some faceless bureaucrat to sign off on it. We could also learn from the US and introduce some sort of sandbox environment where we can test new financial products without having to comply with every single regulation from day one.
This would make a huge difference to companies like mine, which are trying to disrupt the status quo and bring new ideas to the market.
Scrap the Green Belt to Save the Planet
I was cycling through the countryside last weekend and saw all these fields just sitting empty, it got me thinking about how we use land in this country. We've got a housing crisis and people can't afford to live anywhere, but at the same time we're not allowed to build on huge swaths of land because of the Green Belt. It's like we're prioritizing some idealized notion of rural England over actual human needs.
I'm not saying we should just concrete over everything, but surely we can find a more balanced approach. I've read about how other countries like Germany and France have more flexible zoning laws and it seems to work out okay for them. We could be using some of this land for renewable energy projects or sustainable housing, but instead it's just sitting there. It's like we're so afraid of change that we're willing to sacrifice our own environmental goals.
Scrap the farmer subsidies, just let them get on with it.
The government should immediately abolish all direct farming subsidies and replace them with a simple, transparent tax credit system for investments in sustainable practices. These subsidies are a bureaucratic nightmare, distorting markets and propping up inefficient farms while doing little to genuinely improve environmental outcomes. They’re a relic of a bygone era that encourage dependency rather than innovation.
The current system is a labyrinth of red tape that costs a fortune to administer and is often captured by larger agricultural businesses. Farmers spend more time filling out forms than actually farming. A tax credit approach, similar to what some other countries use, would allow farmers to choose the sustainability investments that make sense for their specific land and business model, whether that's cover cropping, renewable energy installation, or improved water management.
Let's ditch First Past the Post before my local council gets even weirder
I was at a parish council meeting last week, and honestly, it was a joke. The turnout was pathetic, and the same three people decide everything, even though the ward is split pretty evenly between a few different views. It just reinforces how broken our system is when a tiny minority can dictate policy because of how the votes fall. It’s not representative of anything, really.
We need to move to a form of proportional representation, like the Single Transferable Vote (STV) they use in Ireland for their Dáil. It means your vote actually counts, even if your first choice doesn't win. People can rank candidates, and if their top pick is out, their vote transfers to their second choice, and so on. It discourages tactical voting and forces parties to appeal to a broader base, not just cling onto safe seats by scaring people about the other lot.
Think about it.
What do you think?
Vote on individual policies, adapt them, or write your own alternative. Good ideas should be tested.