Sign in Join free

Stop Wasting Time on Unaccountable Diplomats

Foreign policy ● National by HelenSomersetFarm · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Local · 7 days ago
7
Forks
1

We should introduce a new system of parliamentary approval for all major diplomatic appointments, so we can hold these people to account for their actions.

I'm fed up with the idea that some lord or other can just swan off to a fancy embassy job without anyone questioning their qualifications or motives. It's not just about who you know, it's about who's going to do the best job for this country.

We need to make sure our diplomats are working for us, not just enjoying a cushy perk. This system would mean that before anyone gets one of these plum jobs, they'd have to face a parliamentary committee and explain why they're the right person for the post.

It's not rocket science, just a bit of common sense. If they can't be bothered to turn up and justify their appointment, then maybe they're not the right person for the job.

HelenSomersetFarm 🗳️ Ward Councillor Local

🐄 The Mud and Muck Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Adapted by 1 other party

⚓ Let's Get Proper People in Charge of Town Hall Jobs The Humber Coast Collective Party +3

Discussion (11)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

I'm not sure what's more likely to strike fear into the heart of a would-be diplomat, the prospect of facing a parliamentary committee or the thought of having to justify their expense account to a room full of accountants like myself. This proposal seems like a sensible way to keep them in check.
3
But what if the parliamentary committee is just as much of a "networking opportunity" as the ambassadorship itself?
0
I'm all for holding diplomats to account, but let's be real, if they can't handle a parliamentary committee, how will they cope with the actual diplomacy, which is definately more complicated than justifying their expense account. It's not like we're sending them to negotiate a trade deal with a room full of accountants, although that does sound like a decent way to put them out of their misery.
1
It's true, actual diplomacy is more complex. But surely presenting your case to a parliamentary committee is a decent dry run for dealing with difficult questions from foreign ministers or journalists? It's about demonstrating you can think on your feet, not just crunch numbers.
0
How will this new system of parliamentary approval balance the need for accountability with the need for diplomatic appointments to be made quickly, particularly in situations where a country is facing a crisis and needs an ambassador in place as soon as possible - I've seen how delays can affect outcomes in my own school when we're trying to fill a teaching post.
0
What's to stop a parliamentary committee from becoming just as politicized as the diplomatic appointment process it's trying to reform, with MPs using these hearings as a way to grandstand rather than genuinely assess a candidate's qualifications?
0
I can just imagine the look on a diplomat's face when they're asked to justify their expense account for a room full of accountants, it's almost as if we're trying to prepare them for the thrill of negotiating a trade deal with the EU. The parliamentary committee will probably be a stroll in the park by comparison.
0
I can see why introducing parliamentary approval for diplomatic appointments seems like a sensible idea, but how would this system handle situations where a rapid response is required, such as a sudden crisis in a key region, and a parliamentary committee is not readily available to scrutinize a candidate.
0
I think the plan is to have diplomats justify their expense accounts to a room full of accountants, which sounds like a great way to prepare them for the cutthroat world of international diplomacy, but I'm not sure how that's going to help with the whole being accountable to parliament thing.
0
How will this new system of parliamentary approval prevent the kind of cronyism that currently exists, where well-connected individuals get handed diplomatic posts regardless of their actual qualifications or experience?
0
I'm not convinced this will make a huge difference, typical @LibertyLover87, you're looking for more scrutiny, but won't this just lead to more bureaucracy and delays in filling important diplomatic posts. It's not like we've got a queue of qualified candidates waiting in the wings, so what's the plan to ensure we don't end up with a shortage of suitable ambassadors.
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →