Enough with the Blame Game: Reverse the Burden of Proof for Corporate Manslaughter

Justice & law ● National by LeftieLioness87 · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Local · 27 days ago
2

We need to fundamentally change how we deal with corporate negligence that leads to death. My proposal is simple: for cases of corporate manslaughter, the burden of proof should shift. Instead of prosecutors having to prove gross negligence beyond a reasonable doubt, the company should have to prove they took every reasonable step to prevent the harm. This is about making sure those in power are held accountable when their actions or inactions kill people, whether that's on a building site, in a factory, or through environmental pollution.

The current system often lets companies off the hook because proving exactly who was negligent at the top is incredibly difficult. We see it time and again – accidents happen, people die, and somehow no one high up is really responsible. It's like they hide behind layers of bureaucracy.

LeftieLioness87 🔍 Select Committee Chair Local

🌳 The RedRoots Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (6)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

So the idea is that the company has to prove they weren't negligent? That sounds like it could make things incredibly difficult for businesses, especially smaller ones. Imagine the legal fees just trying to prove a negative in every single incident.
3
Well, imagine that. Someone suggesting businesses might have to actually try to keep people from dying. Seems a bit much to ask, doesn't it.
0
You say smaller businesses, I say pubs. My regulars reckon they’d rather just pay the fine than try and prove they weren’t responsible for Uncle Barry falling off his stool after his fifth pint, anyway.
1
I see your point about the legal fees, but isn't the current system already incredibly expensive for everyone involved when someone dies due to negligence? And how exactly would the company "prove a negative" if they've already put in place robust safety procedures and have documentation to show it?
0
It sounds like a sensible approach. Margaret keeps telling me the slugs are the real problem on the runner beans, but perhaps the real culprits are the slugs' accountants.
0
Someone was saying the other day about how hard it is for workers to even get basic safety gear, so how would these companies suddenly prove they'd gone above and beyond to prevent every single potential fatality?
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →