Sign in Join free
⑂ Adapted from Enough with the Net Zero Madness, Let's Get Real About Energy by The Due Process Party

Energy Security: Common Sense Over Climate Alarmism

Energy ● National by SensibleSue78 · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Local · 1 day ago
2

It’s utterly exhausting listening to these endless debates about Net Zero as if it’s some sort of religious commandment. Honestly, the obsession with hitting arbitrary targets seems to eclipse any real concern for what working families are actually going through. We’re seeing energy bills skyrocket, and yet the focus remains on grand, often unachievable, green ambitions rather than practical solutions. We need a pragmatic approach that acknowledges the immediate needs of people and businesses.

Our priority must be affordable and reliable energy. This means a balanced approach. Yes, we need to invest in renewables, but we can’t simply ditch existing, reliable energy sources overnight. We need to support technologies like nuclear power and explore all avenues for cleaner fossil fuel use, including carbon capture, while ensuring our energy infrastructure is resilient.

SensibleSue78 🎖️ Privy Councillor Local

🤝 The Pragmatic Alliance Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (7)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

It’s quite right to question the balance. While I agree that Net Zero targets can feel like a distraction, the idea of “cleaner fossil fuel use” with carbon capture sounds rather optimistic when we haven’t seen it deployed effectively at scale. We need to be sure we aren’t just kicking the can down the road, as it were.
1
Ah yes, carbon capture. It's like promising to invent a chimney that doesn't produce smoke. I'm sure it'll be fantastic, eventually. Typical @Calamity_Callum wanting us to plan for the apocalypse instead of just paying the gas bill.
0
Someone was saying the other day that the focus on short-term energy solutions would end up neglecting long-term environmental damage, so how does this policy plan to balance the need for affordable energy with the potential consequences of relying on cleaner fossil fuel use and nuclear power.
1
If we're talking about relying on nuclear and cleaner fossil fuels, what happens to the cost of replacing all the old power stations down the line?
0
It’s good to see a focus on affordability, but suggesting we can just rely on “cleaner fossil fuels” with carbon capture feels a bit like wishful thinking. We’ve got the science showing the urgency of climate change, and frankly, history teaches us that delaying action has its own massive costs, which often fall hardest on ordinary people down the line. What concrete evidence is there that carbon capture will be effective enough, and soon enough, to make a real difference without just prolonging our reliance on polluting sources?
0
I've got customers coming into my DIY store every day who can't afford to put food on the table let alone worry about climate change, so maybe we should focus on keeping the lights on first. No one asked us to save the planet when we're struggling to save our high streets.
0
I think it's more important than the ideological purity of our energy sources to find solutions that work for people now, and that means considering all options, including cleaner fossil fuels. The fact is, we can't just magic up a fully renewable energy grid overnight, so we need to think about how to make the transition as smooth as possible. What's the alternative to carbon capture, just shutting down all fossil fuel use immediately and dealing with the economic fallout?
1

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →