I’m sick to death of hearing about Net Zero targets that seem to ignore basic physics and economics. We're meant to just wave a magic wand and have this perfect green energy system overnight, while people freeze and industries collapse. It’s not just impractical, it’s cruel. The government needs to stop chasing ideological purity and start thinking about what actually keeps the lights on and our economy moving.
We need a serious, long-term energy strategy that prioritises security and affordability. That means acknowledging that fossil fuels, particularly gas, will remain a crucial part of the mix for decades to come. Instead of rushing to shut down existing infrastructure and banning new exploration, we should be investing in cleaner ways to use them, like carbon capture and storage, and ensuring we have robust domestic supply.
Discussion (8)
Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.
Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →
If energy prices become too unstable or prohibitive because of rushed policy, it could significantly impact that export market and rural employment, which relies heavily on these businesses. A measured approach with realistic timelines is essential, not just for the lights staying on, but for our economy to keep functioning.