Local Jobs for Local People, Not Just Lip Service
What's the point of having all these big corporations in our city if they're just going to import workers from elsewhere and not even bother training any locals. I mean it's just common sense that if you're going to set up shop in our community you should be giving back to it in some way. That's why I think we should be pushing for a policy that requires any large company setting up in our area to have a certain percentage of local employees.
This wouldn't just be some token gesture, it would be a real commitment to investing in our community. We're not talking about just any jobs either, we're talking about skilled work that can provide a decent standard of living for people. And it's not like it's going to be a burden on these companies, they'll actually benefit from having a workforce that knows the area and can give them a unique perspective on the local market.
Time to Put Community First
We need to start putting the needs of our local communities at the heart of decision making, rather than just paying lip service to the idea of a fair and prosperous society. I've seen it time and time again in Brixton, where big promises are made but nothing ever seems to change, and it's the same story all over the country.
We've got communities that are struggling to make ends meet, with food banks and homeless shelters being used more and more, and it's clear that the current system isn't working. That's why we need to give local people more control over the resources and services that affect their lives, so they can make decisions that actually benefit their community, rather than just lining the pockets of big businesses and corporations.
Our Defence Budget: Public Money for Public Safety, Not Private Profit
It’s easy to point fingers at government spending and say it’s all inefficient. Of course, there are always areas for improvement, and nobody wants to see public money wasted. But the idea that handing over something as fundamental as national defence to private companies, driven by nothing but profit, is the simple answer just doesn’t sit right with me. It feels like a very dangerous shortcut.
We've seen what happens when essential services are privatised. Costs often go up in the long run, accountability vanishes, and the quality can suffer as corners are cut to boost shareholder dividends. Defence isn't like outsourcing the catering for a council meeting. It’s about protecting our country, our people, and frankly, it's too important to be left to the market. What happens if a key supplier goes bust during a critical time? That’s not a risk we should be taking.
Scrap the Council's ghastly concrete 'public art' and plant trees instead!
I was walking past the old market site the other day, you know, the one they've tarted up with that ridiculously expensive metal monstrosity? Honestly, it just looks like a giant rusty paperclip. All that money, and what do we get? A blight on the landscape. Meanwhile, just down the road, we’ve got a patch of wasteland that could be a proper community garden, or at least some decent trees.
This council seems to think “improving the environment” means commissioning bizarre sculptures that cost a fortune and serve no purpose. What we actually need is greenery. Real, living greenery that cleans the air, provides shade, and makes the place look less like a brutalist afterthought. Imagine if that ‘art’ budget went towards planting more mature trees in places like Stockwell and Brixton, creating proper green corridors instead of these sterile plazas.
What do you think?
Vote on individual policies, adapt them, or write your own alternative. Good ideas should be tested.