It’s easy to talk about bobbies on the beat, but what does that actually mean when the social care system is collapsing around them? I see it every day. Our police are stretched so thin they’re dealing with issues that social workers should be handling, simply because there’s no one else. We need officers who know the community, yes, but they need backup from properly funded services that can actually prevent kids ending up in care or families spiralling into crisis.
The idea of cutting bureaucracy sounds good, but in reality, it often means less oversight and potentially worse outcomes for vulnerable people. We need less red tape for families trying to access support, not for the police to cut corners. Instead of just throwing more money at policing without addressing the root causes of crime, we should be investing heavily in early intervention programs, mental health support, and decent housing.
Discussion (5)
Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.
Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →
It feels like we're patching up the cracks after the house has already fallen down, and then wondering why the emergency services are overwhelmed. You can’t just put more people on the front line if the back-end services that could prevent them being needed in the first place are barely functioning.