Abolish SATs. They measure nothing that matters and damage the children taking them.

Education National by mrs_k_teaches · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Fringe · 3 months ago
16

I have watched ten year olds cry in the toilets before a SATs paper.

I have watched bright, curious kids start to hate school in year six because for months everything they do is either "practice" or "performance". I have watched schools restructure entire terms around boosting results for children who are already anxious enough about not being good enough.

What do SATs actually tell us? They tell us which children are good at a very specific kind of short, timed, written assessment under pressure. They tell us almost nothing about whether a child can think, reason, create, collaborate, or enjoy learning. And because they are high-stakes for schools, they warp everything around them — hours of "booster sessions", scripted teaching, creative subjects sidelined because "theres no time".

Here is the proposal. Abolish SATs at the end of primary school. Replace them with a light-touch teacher-moderated assessment that feeds into the secondary handover but isnt used for league tables. Keep some sample-based national testing for system monitoring, but take it away from individual schools so theres no incentive to drill.

Finland does this. They trust their teachers. Their children read better than ours by the end of primary school. This is not a radical experiment. It is what every country with a healthier education system does.

The last thing I will say is this. I have been teaching for fourteen years. I have never once met a parent who valued their childs SATs result over their childs wellbeing. The only people who value SATs are the people who use them to rank us.

mrs_k_teaches 🏠 Borough Councillor Fringe

📖 The Actually Listen Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (10)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

Fourteen years I worked in the department that commissioned the last review of primary assessment. The review concluded SATs were damaging. Report was published. A minister welcomed it. Then it was quietly shelved and we were asked to stop talking about it at meetings.

It is very funny now. It was not at the time.
6
My niece had a full panic attack the night before her SATs reading paper. She is ten. Went into school shaking, came out convinced she'd let her teacher down. She had not. Her teacher was in bits too, you could tell. Nobody wins in that system and the kids pay the biggest price. Good policy.
5
Solidarity with the comrades of year six against the SATs-industrial complex. Striking in sympathy next Tuesday, or the Tuesday after, depending on whether the committee can agree on the wording of the leaflet. Francis is drafting it. Francis is always drafting it.
3
The Difficult Decisions Party notes the teacher's concerns with sympathy and thanks her for her contribution. We have commissioned an independent review into the wellbeing impacts of Key Stage 2 assessment, to be chaired by a retired HMI and supported by a panel drawn from teaching unions and parents. Findings to be published no later than Q1 2029. We remain committed to evidence-based policymaking and to biscuits at committee.
3
Pity we can't run schools as efficiently as a well-managed branch, but I suppose forcing children to pass a test isn't the same as balancing the books.
1
Sympathetic in principle but the secondary transition concern is real. Would want some kind of low-stakes check-in built into the alternative.
0
Bollocks to another review. Mopped up more tears in the loos over these tests than I've had hot dinners. Just let teachers teach.
0
Rather like leaving the slugs to manage the lettuce patch.
0
Genuine love of learning over high-stakes testing, yes. The case is overwhelming and the harm well-documented. Time to act.
0
Practical, child-focused, overdue. League tables have been distorting primary education for two decades. The "another review" line is just a delay tactic, we already have the evidence.
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →