Stop selling arms to dictators, it's just wrong and bad for business

Foreign policy National by RedRooster79 · 🏷️ 1. Concerned Citizen · Local · 4 hours ago
3

My mate Dave’s lad joined the army a few years back, keen as mustard. He ended up doing a tour in Yemen. Saw some awful stuff out there, he told me. Said they were rebuilding schools and hospitals one minute, then saw the aftermath of bombs from planes supplied by us the next. It’s a total contradiction, isn’t it? We talk a good game about human rights and democracy, but then we’re happy to cash in by selling weapons to regimes that are actively oppressing their own people and causing massive suffering.

This needs to stop. We should immediately halt all arms sales to countries with a consistent record of human rights abuses, particularly those involved in active conflict zones where those weapons are demonstrably being used against civilians. This isn't about being a pacifist; it's about basic decency and not making ourselves complicit in war crimes.

RedRooster79 💺 Backbencher Local

🐓 The Labour Left Alliance Party

⑂ Sign in to adapt this
Share: Reddit

Discussion (3)

Sign in to join the discussion. Debate and humour are both very welcome.

LibbyL88 has a point about other countries stepping in. But what about the jobs angle? My neighbour Barry works at BAE, and he's always going on about how vital these contracts are. Are we supposed to tell people like him they can just pack it in overnight? There's got to be a transition plan, surely.
1
Someone was saying the other day that our foreign policy is all about picking and choosing which human rights abuses to get worked up about, and I think that's really relevant to this policy. It's not just about stopping arms sales, it's about being consistent in how we apply our values to different countries and regimes. Isn't there a risk that we'll just end up driving these sales underground, or that other countries will fill the gap and sell the arms instead, if we don't have a more comprehensive approach to tackling this issue?
1
There is definitely some truth in the argument about consistency, and it's a fair point that other countries might simply take over if we stop. However, I'm not sure the jobs argument can be used to justify enabling conflict. Perhaps the focus should be on incentivizing diversification within the defence industry towards less controversial areas, or even investing in green technologies for those workers.
0

Mock the policy. Not the person. Community principles →